Rogers on Article XXX: Of both kinds
Thomas Rogers, 1607
Commentaries on Article XXX: Rogers (1607)Ellis (1660)Burnet (1699)Beveridge (d. 1708)Welchman (1713)Practical Exposition (1716)Veneer (1725)Madan (1772)Hey (1796)Tomline (1799)Wilson (1821)Jones (1849)Trollope (1850)Browne (1850)Forbes (1867)Boultbee (1871)Maclear & Williams (1895)Green (1896)Gibson (1896)Jackson (1900)Bicknell (1919) · Article 30: text, context and Study
Article XXX. Of both kinds
The Cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the Lay-people: for both the parts of the Lord's Sacrament, by Christ's ordinance and commandment, ought to be ministered to all Christian men alike.
Text: Book of Common Prayer (1662)
Transcription from EEBO-TCP (CC0): https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A10958.0001.001. Text: The Faith, Doctrine, and Religion, Professed, & Protected in the Realme of England (Cambridge: John Legatt, 1607), the edition later reprinted as The Catholic Doctrine of the Church of England. Transcription from EEBO-TCP A10958 (CC0), in its original spelling; special characters normalised; marginal references appear as notes; [?] marks an illegible letter and [...] an illegible passage in the source.
The Proposition. The people must be partakers not only of the Bread, but also of the Wine, when they approach vnto the Lords Table.
The proofe from Gods word.
OVr Lord, and Sauiour Christ hath instituted his Supper, as he will haue not only the Bread, but also the Cup to be deliuered vnto all Communicants. So find wee in the word of God, namely
That the Bread must be giuen to All, and eaten of All 1;
The Cup is to be giuen to All, and to be drunken of All 2.
Heereunto subscribe the Churches 3.
The adversaries vnto this truth.
Though it be a mans couenant, yet when it is confirmed no man doth abrogate, or addeth any thing thereunto 4. What impudencie then, yea, what impietie doe they showe, which alter this ordinance of God?
Some, by adding thereto: So added was vnto the Bread, Cheese by the Autotarits 5: Blood, by the Cataphrygians 6; the Seed of man, by the Manichies 7; vnto the Wine, warme Water by the Moscouits 8.
Some, by taking there from: so the Eutratits 9, the Tatians 10, the Seuerians 11, vse no wine at all; the Manichies doe minister only the Bread 12; the Papistes, though they vse both kinds; yet they alwaies denie the Cup vnto the people, and vnto Priests also when they say not Masse 13, affirming that
The people, participating of the Cup, thereby perceaue no fruite of spirituall comfort; but receaue to themselues damnation 14.
It is not by Gods, but Mans lawe, that Lay persons communicate, either in both kinds, or in one 15.
Notwithstanding that Christ instituted the Sacrament to be receaued vnder both kinds, and the primitiue Church accordingly did so administer the same: Hoc tamen non obstante, yet this notwithstanding, it is to be taken of the Laitie, but vnder one kind 16.
Some, by confounding the elements? So the Moscouites doe mingle Bread, and Wine together 17; and the Papistes make a mixture of Wine and Water, maintaining that Water must be mixt with Wine at the consecration of the blood 18; and that the mixture of Water with Wine, without sin cannot be omitted 19.
Some, by changing the Elements? So the Aquarians, and the Hydroparastites, for Wine administred, and gaue Water vnto the people 20.
Footnotes
-
Matth. 26.26. Marke 14.22. Luke 22.19. 1. Cor. 10 16.1[?].25. ↩
-
Matth. 26.27 Marke 22.17. 1. Cor. 10.16.11.25. ↩
-
Confess. Heluet. 1. ar. 22. & 2. c. 21. Bohem. c. 13. Gal. ar. 36.38. Belg. ar. 35. August. de Missa, ar. 1.2. Saxon. ar. 15. VVittemb. c. 19. Suc. c. 18. ↩
-
Gal. 3.15. ↩
-
Epiphan. ↩
-
Philastrius. ↩
-
August. de hares. ↩
-
[?]. Faber de relig. Moseo. ↩
-
Epiphan. ↩
-
Theodores. ↩
-
Epiphan. ↩
-
Leo scr. 4. quadrages. ↩
-
Concil. Trid. ses. 5. cap. 1. & ses. 21. can. 1.2.3 ↩
-
Censura. Colon. pag. 289. ↩
-
Jbid. pag. 283. ↩
-
Concil. Constan. ses. 13. ↩
-
Surius co. ment. an. 1501. pag. 31. ↩
-
Catech. Trid. ↩
-
Ibid. ↩
-
Theodores. ↩
Source: EEBO-TCP, https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A10958.0001.001