Jackson on Article XXX: Of both kinds
Bernard C. Jackson, 1900
Commentaries on Article XXX: Rogers (1607)Ellis (1660)Burnet (1699)Beveridge (d. 1708)Welchman (1713)Practical Exposition (1716)Veneer (1725)Madan (1772)Hey (1796)Tomline (1799)Wilson (1821)Jones (1849)Trollope (1850)Browne (1850)Forbes (1867)Boultbee (1871)Maclear & Williams (1895)Green (1896)Gibson (1896)Jackson (1900)Bicknell (1919) · Article 30: text, context and Study
Article XXX. Of both kinds
The Cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the Lay-people: for both the parts of the Lord's Sacrament, by Christ's ordinance and commandment, ought to be ministered to all Christian men alike.
Text: Book of Common Prayer (1662)
Cleaned OCR; [...] marks passages cut for illegibility. See the scan. Text: The Thirty-nine Articles: a short exposition, by Bernard C. Jackson (London: Church Book Room, 1900). Short notes on each Article. Cleaned OCR from the Internet Archive scan; passages too garbled to recover are marked [...]. Public domain.
The administration in both kinds was forbidden by the Council of Constance in 1415, and this was confirmed by the Council of Trent. The reason for so doing seems to have been partly practical and partly doctrinal—practical because of the difficulty of reserving and the danger of spilling the wine, doctrinal because of ‘‘ the _ theory of concomitance,’’ that the whole Christ is contained under each species. In either case the real reason was the doctrine of ‘‘ the real presence.’’ The restoration of the cup to the laity was one of the first demands of the Reformation.
Article XXXI. OF THE ONE OBLATION OF
CHRIST FINISHED UPON THE Cross.
Read at the Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/thirtyninearticl0000jack