Wilson on Article XXX: Of both kinds
William Wilson, 1821
Commentaries on Article XXX: Rogers (1607)Ellis (1660)Burnet (1699)Beveridge (d. 1708)Welchman (1713)Practical Exposition (1716)Veneer (1725)Madan (1772)Hey (1796)Tomline (1799)Wilson (1821)Jones (1849)Trollope (1850)Browne (1850)Forbes (1867)Boultbee (1871)Maclear & Williams (1895)Green (1896)Gibson (1896)Jackson (1900)Bicknell (1919) · Article 30: text, context and Study
Article XXX. Of both kinds
The Cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the Lay-people: for both the parts of the Lord's Sacrament, by Christ's ordinance and commandment, ought to be ministered to all Christian men alike.
Text: Book of Common Prayer (1662)
Cleaned OCR; [...] marks passages cut for illegibility. See the scan. Text: The Thirty-nine Articles of the Church of England, illustrated by copious extracts from the Liturgy, Homilies, Nowell's Catechism, and Jewell's Apology, and confirmed by numerous passages of Scripture, by William Wilson, B.D. (Oxford, 1821). Cleaned OCR from the Internet Archive scan; passages too garbled to recover are marked [...]. Public domain.
b When the people come to the holy communion, the sacra- ment ought to be given them in both kinds : for so both Christ hath commanded, and the Apostles in every place have ordained, and all the ancient Fathers and catholic Bishops have followed the same. And whoso doeth contrary to this, he, as Gelasius saith, committeth sacrilege. Jewell.
a Ye cannot drink the cup of the saying, Drink ye all of it. Matt.
Lord and the cup of devils. 1 Cor. xxvi. 27. And he took the cup,
x. 21. Let a man examine himself, and when he had given thanks, he
and so let him eat of that bread gave it to them, and they all drank
and drink of that cup. 1 Cor. xi. of it. Mark xiv. 23. As often as
- ye eat this bread, and drink this
b And he took the cup, and gave cup, ye do shew the Lord’s death
thanks, and gave it to them all, till he come. 1 Cor. xi. 26.
Notes
- Q. And dost thou say that all ought alike to receive both parts of the sacrament? A. Yea, verily. For sith the Lord hath expressly commanded, it were a most high offence in any part to abridge his commandment. Nowell, p. 108.
Read at the Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/thirtyninearticl00wils