Rogers on Article XXIX: Of the Wicked which eat not the Body of Christ in the use of the Lord's Supper
Thomas Rogers, 1607
Commentaries on Article XXIX: Rogers (1607)Ellis (1660)Burnet (1699)Beveridge (d. 1708)Welchman (1713)Practical Exposition (1716)Veneer (1725)Madan (1772)Hey (1796)Tomline (1799)Wilson (1821)Jones (1849)Trollope (1850)Browne (1850)Forbes (1867)Boultbee (1871)Maclear & Williams (1895)Green (1896)Gibson (1896)Jackson (1900)Bicknell (1919) · Article 29: text, context and Study
Article XXIX. Of the Wicked which eat not the Body of Christ in the use of the Lord's Supper
The Wicked, and such as be void of a lively faith, although they do carnally and visibly press with their teeth (as Saint Augustine saith) the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ, yet in no wise are they partakers of Christ: but rather, to their condemnation, do eat and drink the sign or Sacrament of so great a thing.
Text: Book of Common Prayer (1662)
Transcription from EEBO-TCP (CC0): https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A10958.0001.001. Text: The Faith, Doctrine, and Religion, Professed, & Protected in the Realme of England (Cambridge: John Legatt, 1607), the edition later reprinted as The Catholic Doctrine of the Church of England. Transcription from EEBO-TCP A10958 (CC0), in its original spelling; special characters normalised; marginal references appear as notes; [?] marks an illegible letter and [...] an illegible passage in the source.
The proposition. The wicked, and such as be void of a liuely faith, doe not eate the Body, nor drinke the Blod of Iesus Christ, in the vse of the Lords Supper.
The proofe from Gods word.
S. Paul doth shewe, how the Supper of the Lord is receiued of some worthily, which do examine, and iudge themselues 1, and discerne the Lords Body 2, as also doe abstaine from the table of deuills 3. How these doe participate of the Body, and blood of Christ, it hath alreadie bin shewen in the last mentioned article, prop. 4.
Againe, of others the same is vnworthily receiued 4, that is to say which themselues doe not examine, nor iudge 5, neither discerne the Lords body6, and doe communicate at the Table of the Lord, and at the Table of deuils 7. These may receiue the Sacrament, but not the true Body of Christ. The reasons be, for that
They lacke the wedding garment 8, which is Faith, and the righteousnesse of Christ.
They are no members of the true Church, the Head whereof is Iesus Christ 9.
They haue no promise of heauenly refreshing, because they are without a liuely faith 10.
Therefore they procure vnto themselues most heauie punishements 11, as, diseases, death, guiltines of the Body, and Blood of Christ, and therewith damnation.
Of this iudgement be other Churches Christian, and reformed besides 12·
Errors, & adversaries vnto this truth.
The adversaries of this dorine are
The Vbiquitaries, both Lutheran, and Popish; they saing the very Body of Christ at the Lords Supper, is eaten aswell of the wicked as of the godly13, these affirming, that al Communicants badde and good, doe eate the very, and naturall Body of Christ Iesus 14: they saying, that the true, and reall Body of Christ, In With, Vnder the bread, and wine, may be eaten, chewed,15 and digested euen of Turkes, which neuer were of the Church 16, & these maintaining that vnder the forme of Bread, the same true and reall body of Christ, may be deuoured of Dogs, Hogs, Cats, and Rats.
Footnotes
-
- Cor. ii.28.
-
Ibid. 29. ↩
-
Cor. 10.21. ↩
-
- Co. 1138.39
-
Ibid. 38.31. ↩
-
Ibid. 29. ↩
-
- Cor. 10.21.
-
Matth. 22.11.21. ↩
-
Ephes. 4.15. &c. ↩
-
Iohn. 6.35. ↩
-
- Cor. 11.27.
-
Confess. Heluet. 1· in the declar. of the L. Supper; Heluet, 2. c. 21. Basil. ar. 6. Bohem. c. 13. Gal. ar. 37. Belg ar. 37. ↩
-
S[?]ur. Antip. 4. par. 1. p. 58. ↩
-
Test. Rhem. annot. 1. Cor. 11.27. ↩
-
Alex. Hales. par. 4. q. 45. & D. Thom. par. 3. q. 8. ar. 3. ↩
-
So reporteth Sturmius in his Antipap. 4. par. 2. pag. 106. ↩
Source: EEBO-TCP, https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A10958.0001.001