Tomline on Article XIII: Of Works before Justification
George Pretyman Tomline, 1818
Commentaries on Article XIII: Rogers (1607)Ellis (1660)Burnet (1699)Beveridge (d. 1708)Welchman (1713)Practical Exposition (1716)Veneer (1725)Madan (1772)Hey (1796)Tomline (1799)Wilson (1821)Jones (1849)Trollope (1850)Browne (1850)Forbes (1867)Boultbee (1871)Maclear & Williams (1895)Green (1896)Gibson (1896)Jackson (1900)Bicknell (1919) · Article 13: text, context and Study
Article XIII. Of Works before Justification
Works done before the grace of Christ, and the Inspiration of his Spirit, are not pleasant to God, forasmuch as they spring not of faith in Jesus Christ, neither do they make men meet to receive grace, or (as the School-authors say) deserve grace of congruity: yea rather, for that they are not done as God hath willed and commanded them to be done, we doubt not but they have the nature of sin.
Text: Book of Common Prayer (1662)
Cleaned OCR; [...] marks passages cut for illegibility. See the scan. Text: Elements of Christian Theology, by George Pretyman Tomline, Bishop of Lincoln (first published 1799), vol. 2, part III: An Exposition of the Thirty-nine Articles (London, 1818 edition). Cleaned OCR from the Internet Archive copy of the Google scan; passages too garbled to recover are marked [...]. Public domain.
Every action which men perfonn by their own unassisted powers must necessarily partake of the general imperfection and corruption of their nature; and therefore their works done be- fore they are s^ngthened by the grace of CHRIST, and guided by the inspiration of HIS spirit, cannot be pleasant to god,
IN JESUS CHRIST, the Only principle which can
render them acceptable in the sight of God.
^^ Without faith it is impossible to please
VOL, II. T God.”
a74 Exposition of the f part m.
God (ay-—” They that are in the flesh (that is, who are not purified by the spiritual religion of Christ) cannot please God (by
Bishop Burnet makes a distinction, which sets the doctrine of this article in a clear point of view : ” A great difference is here to be made between an external action, as it is considered in itself, and the same action as it was done by such a man. An action is called good from the morality and nature of the action itself : so actions of justice and charity are in themselves good, whatsoever the doer of them may be ; but actions are consi- dered by God with relation to him that does them in another light; his principles, ends, and motives, with all the other circxmistances of the action, come into this account ; for unless all these be good, let the action in its own abstracted nature be ever so good, it cannot render the doer accept- able or meritorious in the sight of God.”
Nor can these works possess such degree of merit, as of themselves to make men meet, or worthy^ to receive grace, or (as the
SCHOOL authors SAY) GRACE OF CONGRUITT.
All grace is the free gift of our heavenly Father, for ” the love of God our Saviour towards man appeared, not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he
saved
(a) Heb. c. i r. v. 6. (h) Rom”, c. 8. v. S.
AUT. XIII.] Thirty-nine Articles. 575
saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost (c).” The school divines, or schoolmen, as they are called, speak of two sorts of merit, the merit of condignity and the merit of co^igruity ; the former they ascribe to works whicV men do by the assistance of grace, and to which ^hey assert that a reward is injustice due ; the latter they ascribe to such works as men do by mere strength of free-wiU, and which are to be rewarded only out of liberality (d). We find no such distinction in the Scriptures ; they teach us in general to consider man as inca- pable of doing any thing which shall be entitled to reward, except through the mercy of God, and for the sake of Christ.
Indeed, so great and universal a depravity is introduced into the dispositions of men in con* sequence of the fall of Adam, that they can in no instance of themselves act as their Creator originally commanded; and therefore, as in all their works performed without divine assistance, there is a departure from the will of God, we
DOUBT
(c) Tit. c. 3. V. 4 and 5.
(d) Mereri ex condigno, est mereii sic, ut ftecuii- dum justitiam sibi debeatur, ita quod injustum esset non reddi mercedem merito ex condigno. Opus cui ex justitia non debetur merces, sed tantum ex con- gtuitate quadam, vel ex sola acceptantis liberalitate.
T 2
[…]
It is the will of God that we should act upon the motives which Christianity proposes to our actions, and no others ; and every resistance to his will and command hath surely ” the nature of sin.” It is a principle of morals and legisla- tion universally admitted, that actions are as their motives, and upon this principle the article now under consideration chiefly turns. Besides, it is not likely that if our motives be wrong, our actions should continue right, though they may incidentally be so. Actions are of a transitory, motives of a permanent, nature.
It is evident that this article, which is founded upon the general doctrine of original sin, ex- plained in the ninth article, applies also to aU persons who have not lived under the Gospel dispensation. But though their works, as being
THE INSPIRATION OF HIS SPIRIT, COUld nOt
have been perfectly pleasing to God, and could not have risen to the standard of merit, yet as men, even in their natural condition, may, in some measure, resist the lusts of the flesh, with- stand temptations to evil, and do things good and laudable when compared with their powers and faculties, we may rest assured that such
conduct
aut. XIII.] Thirty-nine Articles. 277
conduct will be favourably accepted by a just and merciful God, who will judge mankind according to the degrees of instruction, and opportunities of improvement, which have been respectively afforded them; ” If there be a willing mind, it is accepted according to that a man hath, and not according to that a man hath not (e)” And, therefore, though all the actions of all per- sons, who have not been brought to the know, ledge of Christ, are here pronoimced to have the nature of sin, it by no means follows that these actions will, in all cases, exclude men from pardon and salvation. Christ offered himself as a sacrifice for the sins of the whole world, and not solely for that small portion of it, which has been favoured with the light of his religion. Mil- lions who never heard the name of Jesus, but who have been ” a law unto themselves (f)^’^ will be redeemed and blessed for ever through the merits of his death, while those who have pro- fessed themselves his disciples, but ” have held the truth in unrighteousness (gX’ will suffer ” indig- nation and wrath, . tribulation and anguish, de- nounced against every soul of man that doeth evil (h)^” whether he be Jew, Gentile, or Chris- tian;
(e) 2 Cor. c. 8. V. 12. (f) Rom. c. 2. v. 14. (g) Rom. c. 1. v. 18. (h) Rom. c. 2. v. 8 and 9.
T 3
2yS Exposition of the [part hi
tian ; and all this is consistent with the opinion, that the true church of Christ will hereafter be rewarded with appropriate blessings. But we must ever bear in mind, that to whom much is given, of him much will be required : a more ex- alted virtue, and a greater purity of heart, will be expected from Christians, in proportion to the advantages which they have enjoyed. We are to be ” a peculiar people, zealous of good works ;” we are to ” sanctify ourselves as the temples of God;” we are to “depart from all iniquity;” and to aim at being ” perfect, even as our Father which is in heaven is perfect.” And this degree of superiority, which requires incessant watch- fulness and constant energy, will be rewarded by ” the prize of our high calling in Christ/*
AKT. XIV.] Thirty-nine Articles. 279
Read at the Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/elementschristi00tomlgoog