anglicanguide.com v0.1

Rogers on Article XXVIII: Of the Lord's Supper

Thomas Rogers, 1607

Commentaries on Article XXVIII: Rogers (1607)Ellis (1660)Burnet (1699)Beveridge (d. 1708)Welchman (1713)Practical Exposition (1716)Veneer (1725)Madan (1772)Hey (1796)Tomline (1799)Wilson (1821)Jones (1849)Trollope (1850)Browne (1850)Forbes (1867)Boultbee (1871)Maclear & Williams (1895)Green (1896)Gibson (1896)Jackson (1900)Bicknell (1919) · Article 28: text, context and Study

Article XXVIII. Of the Lord's Supper

The Supper of the Lord is not only a sign of the love that Christians ought to have among themselves one to another; but rather is a Sacrament of our Redemption by Christ's death: insomuch that to such as rightly, worthily, and with faith, receive the same, the Bread which we break is a partaking of the Body of Christ; and likewise the Cup of Blessing is a partaking of the Blood of Christ.

Transubstantiation (or the change of the substance of Bread and Wine) in the Supper of the Lord, cannot be proved by holy Writ; but is repugnant to the plain words of Scripture, overthroweth the nature of a Sacrament, and hath given occasion to many superstitions.

The Body of Christ is given, taken, and eaten, in the Supper, only after an heavenly and spiritual manner. And the mean whereby the Body of Christ is received and eaten in the Supper is Faith.

The Sacrament of the Lord's Supper was not by Christ's ordinance reserved, carried about, lifted up, or worshipped.

Text: Book of Common Prayer (1662)

Transcription from EEBO-TCP (CC0): https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A10958.0001.001. Text: The Faith, Doctrine, and Religion, Professed, & Protected in the Realme of England (Cambridge: John Legatt, 1607), the edition later reprinted as The Catholic Doctrine of the Church of England. Transcription from EEBO-TCP A10958 (CC0), in its original spelling; special characters normalised; marginal references appear as notes; [?] marks an illegible letter and [...] an illegible passage in the source.

The Propositions.

  1. The supper of the Lord is a signe of the loue that Christians ought to haue among themselues.

  2. The Lords Supper is a Sacrament of our redemption by Christs death, and to them which receiue the same worthily, by Faith, a partaking of the Body, and Blood of Christ.

  3. The Bread, and Wine in the Lords Supper, be not changed into another substance.

  4. The Body of Christ is giuen, taken, and eaten after an heauenly, and spirituall, not after a carnall sort.

  5. To reserue, carrie about, lift vp, or worship the Sacrament of the Lords Supper, is contrary to the ordinance of Christ.

The Propositions.

1. Proposition. The Supper of the Lord is a signe of the loue that Christians ought to haue among themselues.

The proofe from Gods word.

THe Supper of the Lord is a token of the loue that Christians ought to haue among themselues. For which cause it is called, the Lords table 1, the Lords Supper 2, a communion of the body of Christ, and they that partake thereof, though they be manie, yet are but one bread, and one body 3.

This is the doctrine of all Christian Churches 4.

The errors & adversaries vnto this truth.

So thinke not those men, who either with heretike Hamant, denie the vse of the Lords Supper to be necessarie 5, or with the Rhemists raile on it, and the Protestants that vse the same, calling it, a prophane, and detestable Table, the Cuppe of deuills 6.

2. Proposition. The Sacrament of the Lords Supper is Sacrament of our redemption by Christs death, and to them which receiue the same worthily, by Faith, a partaking of the Body, and blood of Christ.

The proofe from Gods word.

The Sacrament of the Lords Supper is to all Christians, a Sacrament of our redemption by Iesus Christ. For.

This is my blood of the newe Testament which is shedde for many, for the remission of sinnes 7, this is my body, which is giuen for you &c. This cuppe is the newe Testament in my blood, which is shedde for you, saith our Sauiour8.

And to such as receiue the same worthily 9, and by Faith 10, it is the partaking of the Body, and Blood of Christ 11.

This is a truth openly both maintained, & testified by the neighbour Churches 12.

Errors & Adversaries to this truth.

Diuersly hath this proposition bin oppugned. For

Some either denying or not acknowledging the benefite of so heauenly a Sacrament doe say, how

It is to be receiued onely for obedience sake to the princes commandement, but is of none effect to the perfect ones. An opinion of the Families 13.

It doth neither good, nor hurt to the receiuers. The Messalians error 14.

It doth much hurt, and no good, to participate the Lords Supper among Protestants, say the Papists 15.

It is no signe assuring vs that all our sinnes through Christ are pardoned. For onlie veniall, and mortall sinnes, are thereby remitted, 16 and we must alwaies doubt of the forgiuenesse of our sinnes 17, say the same Papistes.

Others doe teach that.

It can profit such as haue no faith, as Babes, and Infants, in which error be the Russians 18; yea the dead bodies of men 19.

It can benefit such as receiue it not at all, if on there behalfe it be administred, as persons absent, vpon the Seas, in the warres, yea and dead; and present too when yet they participate not, but the Priest for them. These errors the Papistes defend.

3. Proposition. The bread and VVine in the Lords Supper, be not changed into another substance.

The proofe of Gods word.

Transsubstantiation, or the change of the substance of Bread, and Wine in the Supper of the Lord, we do vtterly deny; and the reasons, moouing vs thereunto, are for that it is repugnant to the plaine words of the Scripture. For

I will not drinke hencefoorth of this fruite of the Vine, saith our Sauiour Christ 20. Which fruite had it really bin either the Blood, or by way of concomitance, the very Body and blood of Iesus Christ, then our Lord had eaten himselfe, which is not only blasphemous to be spoken, but also impossible to be done, and directly against the word of God, where commandement is often giuen, that the blood with flesh (not of Beast, much lesse of man) must not be eaten 21.

The heauen must containe Iesus Christ vntill the time that all things be restored, saith S. Peter 22. If Christ therefore corporally, according to his humanitie be in heauen, then is he not in the Sacrament.

As often as ye shall eate this Bread (not Christ his reall Body); and drinke this Cuppe (not the reall Blood of Christ), you shewe the Lords death till he come, saith S. Paul 23. Therfore hee is not come; which hee must be, being vnder the formes of Bread, and Wine.

Transubstātiatiō besides ouerthroweth the nature of the Sacrament. For where there is no Element, there can be no Sacrament. Because Gods word comming vnto the element, maketh. a Sacrament.

Finally it hath bin the occasion of much superstition, and Idolatrie. For from hence proceeded, the Reseruation of the Transubstantiated bread for sundrie superstitious purposes: hence the adoration of the Bread, euen as God himselfe, and that both of Priest and people: hence the carrying about in pompous procession, of the wafer-God; and hence the Popish feast called Corpus Christi-day.

The right consideration hereof hath mooued all the Churches reformed to shewe their detestation hereof both by their Sermons, and wrightings 24.

The adversaries vnto this truth.

Abhominable therefore be the Popish errors, viz. that

In the Eucharist there is n[?]t the substance of Bread, and wine, but onely the meere accidents, and qualities 25.

Substantially, and really the Body, and Blood, together with the soule, and diuinitie of our Lord Iesus Christ; and therefore Christ is contained in the Sacrament Eucharisticall 26.

Vnder each kind, and vnder euery part of each kinde seuerally, whole Christ is comprised 27.

After the consecration in the wonderfull Sacrament of the Eucharist, the Body and blood of our Lord Iesus Christ is; and that not onely in the vse, while it is taken, but afore also, and after in the Hosts, or consecrated peices, reserued, or remaining after the Communion 28,

In the holy Sacrament, Christ, the onely begotten Sonne of God, is to be adored with the very worship of Latria 29.

Marcus also that detestable heretike, held that the wine of the Lords Supper was conuerted into blood 30.

4. Proposition. The Body of Christ is giuen, taken, and eaten after an heauenly, and spirituall, not after a carnall sort.

The proofe from Gods word.

The regenerate haue in them a double life, one carnall the other spirituall.

The life carnall and temporarie, they brought with them into this world. The spirituall was giuen vnto them afterward in their second birth through the word 31.

The life carnall and corporall is common to all men, good and badde, and is maintained, and preserued by earthly, and corruptible Bread common also to all and euery man.

The life spirituall is peculiar onely to Gods elect; and is cherished by the bread of life, which came downe from heauen, which is Iesus Christ 32 who norisheth, and susteineth the spirituall life of Christians, being receiued of them by Faith 33.

Which spirituall Bread that he might the better represent, hee hath instituted earthly, and visible Bread, and wine, for a Sacrament of his Body, and Blood. Whereby he doth testifie, that as verily as wee receiue the Bread with the hands, and chewe the same with the teeth, and tongue, to the nourishing of this life temporall: euen so by faith (which is in place of hands and mouth to the soule) wee verily receiue the true Body, and the true blood of Christ, our onely Sauiour, to the cherishing of the spirituall life in our soules.

And heerein there is a goodly consent with the most of the reformed Churches, and vs 34.

The aduersaries vnto this truth.

Ioyntly we withstand the aduersaries thereof whosoeuer, as

The Capernaites, which thought the flesh of our Lord might be eaten with corporall mouthes.

The Synusiastes, or Vbiquitaries 35, which thinke the Body of Christ so is present in the supper, as his said Body with bread and Wine, by one and the same mouth, at one and the same time, of all, and euery communicant, is eaten corporally, and receaued into the Belly.

The Metusiastes, and Papistes, which beleeue the substance of bread and Wine, is so changed into the substance of Christ his body, as nothing remaineth but the reall Body of Christ, besides the accidents of Bread, and wine 36.

The Symbolists, Figurists, and Significatists, who are of opinion that the faithfull at the Lords supper, doe receiue nothing but naked, and bare signes.

5. Proposition. To reserue, carrie about, lift vp, or worship the Sacrament of the Lords Supper, is contrarie to the ordinance of Christ.

The proofe from Gods word.

The true, and lawfull vse of this Sacrament hath bin afore set downe, And there it may suffice vs to be remembred, how the Lords Supper was ordained, that the bread should not only be broken, and eaten 37, the cuppe should onely be giuen, & drunken, 38, and all this done in remembrance of Christ 39.

And so also testifie the Churches reformed.40

Adversaries vnto this truth.

But contrarie to the institution of Christ, the Papistes abuse this holy Sacrament. For

They reserue the same; and not only so, but take it to be a Catholike, a pious, and a necessarie custome, so to reserue it 41, and besides they thinke euery peece, and particle of the Sacrament so reserued, is the very Body of Christ 42.

They carrie it about, both vnto sicke folkes. Hence, saith the Festiuall 43.

As often as any man seeth that Body at Masse, or some other good praier in worship of his soueraigne Lord. And also thorough cities, and townes. For whensoeuer the Pope goeth any iourney, the Sacramentall bread is carried before him on an ambling Iennet, as the Persian kings haue before them carried their Orsmada, or holy fire 44.

In Spaine euen at this day in the time of the peace between the two mightie Kings of great Brittaine, and Spaine, those English men, as meeting the Sacrament in the streetes, will neither doe reuerence therunto; nor goe aside; nor turne into some house, doe fall into the danger of the not holy, but bloody Inquisition 45.

They worship it, and for the same haue ordained a certaine set, and solemne Feast, called Corpus-Christi-day, on which the Sacrament is borne about, lifted vp, and most idolatrously adored 46.

Footnotes

    1. Cor. 10.21.
    ↩
    1. Cor. [?]1.20.
    ↩
    1. Cor. 10.16.17.
    ↩
  1. Confess. Heluet. 2. cap. 21. Basil. ar. 6. Bohem. c. 13. Belg. ar. 35. Saxon. ar. 14. Sue. c. 18. ↩

  2. Hol. chron. fol. 1299. ↩

  3. Test. Rhem. an. 1. Cor. 10.21. ↩

  4. Matth. 26.28 ↩

  5. Luke 22.19.20. Marke 14.24. 1. Cor. 11.24. ↩

    1. Cor. 11.28. &c.
    ↩
    1. Cor. 13.5. Iohn 6.35.
    ↩
    1. Cor. 10.16.17.
    ↩
  6. Confess. Heluet. 1. ar. 22. & 2. cap. 21. Basil. ar. 6. Bohem. c. 13. Gal. ar. 37. Belg. ar. 35. August. touch. the Masse. ar. 1.3. Saxon. ar. 14. VVittemb. c. 19. Sue. c. 19. ↩

  7. Leon. Ram. Confess. an. 1580. ↩

  8. Theodores. eccles. hist. ↩

  9. What can the Protestant churches afford you? &c. the comunio? O poysoned Cup: better it were for you to eate so much Ra[?]sbaine, then that pulluted bread, and to drinke, so much Dragons gall, or Vipers blood, then that sacralegious wine. Garnish of the soule. &c. printed at Autu. an. 1596. by Ioach. Tro. ↩

  10. Catech. Trid. ↩

  11. concil. Trid. ses. 6. cap. 9. ↩

  12. Al. Guag. de relig. Moscouit. p. 268. ↩

  13. Concil. Carthage. 3. can. 6. ↩

  14. Matth. 26.29 Marke 14.25. ↩

  15. Gen. 9.4. Leuit. 17.14. ↩

  16. Act. 3.21. ↩

    1. Cor. 11.20.
    ↩
  17. Confess. Heluet. 1. ar. 22. & 2. c. 21. Basil. ar. 6. Bohem. c. 13. VVittemb c. 19. ↩

  18. Concil. Trid. ses. 3. c. 3. ↩

  19. Test. Rhem. annot. Matth. 26.26. ↩

  20. Concil. Trid. ses. 3. c. 3 Vaux. Catech. c. 4. ↩

  21. Concil. Trid. ses. 3. c. 4. ↩

  22. Concil. Trid. ses. 3. c. 5. ↩

  23. Epiphan. hoeres. 34. ↩

    1. Pet. 1.23.
    ↩
  24. Iohn. 6.51. ↩

  25. Iohn. 6.35. ↩

  26. Confess. Heluet. 1. ar. 22. and 2. c. 21. Basil. ar. 6. Bohem. c. 13. Gal. ar. 36. Belg. ar. 35. ↩

  27. Aliqui […] fugimus, sed in cognatum delabimur […] pani, et vino substantiam equidem relinquendo, sed corporale Christi corpus ita co[?]duniendo, at substantia substantiam vel localiter, vel definitiue, vel repletiue, vel omnibus istis modis simul contineat, quod ipsum Profect̄ milest aliud, quam Transsubstantiationis quoddam quasi inuoluctus &c. Iezler. de diutur. belli Euchar. p. 18. a. ↩

  28. After Consecration there is neither bread, no[?] wine left in this Sacrament, saith Vaux in his catech. By vertue of the words of Consecration the substance of bread, is turned and changed into the verie bodie of Christ: and the substance of wine is turned into the blood of Christ, the holy Ghost working by a diuine power. So that Christ is wholy vnder the forme of bread, and in euery part of the Host, being broken, Christ is wholy. Also vnder the forme of wine, and euery part thereof, being separated, Christ is wholy. Canis. catech. c. 4. Romanenses […] sororem, & plurimorun error[?]m matrem, […], Iezl[?], [?]edi[?]tior. belli […]. p. 31. ↩

  29. Matth 26.28 Marke 14.22. Luke 22.19. 1. Cor. 10.16.11.2. ↩

  30. Matth. 26.27 Marke 14 23. Luke 22.17. 1. Cor. 11.25. ↩

  31. Luke 22.19. 1. Cor. 11.24.25. ↩

  32. Confess. Heluet. 2. c. 21. Basil. ar. 6. Bohem. c. 13. August. de Missa. ar. 1. Sax. ar. 14. VVittemb. c. 19 ↩

  33. Concil. Tri[?]. ses. 3. c. 6. ↩

  34. Jbid. can. 4. ↩

  35. Festiual, 4. Sermons, fel. 169. b: ↩

  36. See cerem. Pontif. lib. 1. When the Pope goeth from one people to another, hee sendeth before him, yea, and sometime a day, or two daies iourney, his Sacrament vpō an Horse, carrying at his necke a little Bell, accompanied with the scum and baggage of the Romaine Court. Thether goe the dishes, and spits, old shoes, caldrous, and kettles, and all the scullerie of the Court, whores and Iesters. Thus the Sacrament arriueth with this honorable traine, at the place whether the Pope is to come, it there awaiteth his comming. And when the maister is knowne to approch neere the people, it goeth foorth to receaue him. So Cyp. Valera, a Spaniard, in his treat. of the Pope, and his a[?]ct. p. 17. ↩

  37. Act of the peace &c. an. 1604. [?]r. 2. to the end touching a Moderation. &c. ↩

  38. Concil. Trid. ses. 3. c. 3. ↩

Source: EEBO-TCP, https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A10958.0001.001