Ellis on Article XXIII: Of Ministering in the Congregation
John Ellis, 1700
Commentaries on Article XXIII: Rogers (1607)Ellis (1660)Burnet (1699)Beveridge (d. 1708)Welchman (1713)Practical Exposition (1716)Veneer (1725)Madan (1772)Hey (1796)Tomline (1799)Wilson (1821)Jones (1849)Trollope (1850)Browne (1850)Forbes (1867)Boultbee (1871)Maclear & Williams (1895)Green (1896)Gibson (1896)Jackson (1900)Bicknell (1919) · Article 23: text, context and Study
Article XXIII. Of Ministering in the Congregation
It is not lawful for any man to take upon him the office of publick preaching, or ministering the Sacraments in the Congregation, before he be lawfully called, and sent to execute the same.
And those we ought to judge lawfully called and sent, which be chosen and called to this work by men who have publick authority given unto them in the Congregation, to call and send Ministers into the Lord's vineyard.
Text: Book of Common Prayer (1662)
Cleaned OCR; [...] marks passages cut for illegibility. See the scan. Text: A Defense of the Thirty Nine Articles of the Church of England, written in Latin by J. Ellis, S.T.D. (Articulorum XXXIX Ecclesiae Anglicanae Defensio, first published 1660), now done into English (London, 1700). Cleaned OCR from the Internet Archive scan of the Early English Books copy; passages too garbled to recover are marked [...]. Public domain.
Obj. 1. There were in the Primitive Church, not 4 few that taught and preached the Word, who were never called, as appears by the Example of those that were dispersed upon the Persecution of the Churc, after the Death of St. Stephen, Acts 8. 4.
Answ. Among those rhat were dispersed, some perhaps were called ; If nor, we grant it to be lawful in an extraordinary time of Persecution, publickiy ro reach, without an ordinary Vocation; and not ocherwile. |
Ob}j. 2. FHle may be truly [iid to be called, who is furnish d with proper Gifts for teaching and insiruting others,
Answ. Alrho’ the foundarion of a true Cal- ting, be {such Gitrs as inable a Man to reach others ; yer there 1s likewise required a Trial
D.3. and
EE” “‘F4 4 Defence of the
and Approbarion of his Gifts, ro be made by others, before he be admitted into Holy Or- ders.
Obj. 3. Se. Panil, when he 7s describing 4 B.shop,..«.os not mention any necessity of a Veca- tion, I +47. 3. “F247. I. 4.
Answ, Altho’ in those places he docs not ex- presly mention a. Vocation ; yet in others he does ; aS Rom. 10. 15. |
Obj. 4. To teach others is a Work of Cha- rity, Jam. 5. 19, 20. and for that reason should not require a special Vocation,
Answ. We do nor deny that to teach others is a Work of Charity, yet it does not frem hence follow, that any one may take upon him to teach and preach publickly in the Church ; not orly because the Scripture very often urgeth thc neceffity. of a Vocation, bur likewise because upon this Account too great a liberry would be given, and even Women would reach in the Church, contrary to the FJudgmenr of the Apostle. 1 Cor. 14. 34: 1 Tim. 2. 12. Besides that, a great many who were really unfit to teaca in the Church, would yer 2c upon them ro do is, Which the Apoltle forbids, 1 Tim. 5. 12.
ART. XXIV. Of Speaking in the Con-
Read at the Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/bim_early-english-books-1641-1700_a-defense-of-the-thirty-_ellis-john_1700