anglicanguide.com v0.1

Rogers on Article XVI: Of Sin after Baptism

Thomas Rogers, 1607

Commentaries on Article XVI: Rogers (1607)Ellis (1660)Burnet (1699)Beveridge (d. 1708)Welchman (1713)Practical Exposition (1716)Veneer (1725)Madan (1772)Hey (1796)Tomline (1799)Wilson (1821)Jones (1849)Trollope (1850)Browne (1850)Forbes (1867)Boultbee (1871)Maclear & Williams (1895)Green (1896)Gibson (1896)Jackson (1900)Bicknell (1919) · Article 16: text, context and Study

Article XVI. Of Sin after Baptism

Not every deadly sin willingly committed after Baptism is sin against the Holy Ghost, and unpardonable. Wherefore the grant of repentance is not to be denied to such as fall into sin after Baptism. After we have received the Holy Ghost, we may depart from grace given, and fall into sin, and by the grace of God we may arise again, and amend our lives. And therefore they are to be condemned, which say, they can no more sin as long as they live here, or deny the place of forgiveness to such as truly repent.

Text: Book of Common Prayer (1662)

Transcription from EEBO-TCP (CC0): https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A10958.0001.001. Text: The Faith, Doctrine, and Religion, Professed, & Protected in the Realme of England (Cambridge: John Legatt, 1607), the edition later reprinted as The Catholic Doctrine of the Church of England. Transcription from EEBO-TCP A10958 (CC0), in its original spelling; special characters normalised; marginal references appear as notes; [?] marks an illegible letter and [...] an illegible passage in the source.

The propositions.

  1. Euery sinne committed after Baptisme, is not the sinne aganst the holy Ghost.

  2. The very regenerate may depart from grace giuen, and fall into sinne, and yet rise againe, vnto newnesse of life.

  3. No men vtterly are to be cast off, as reprobates, which vnfainedly repent.

1. Proposition. Euery sinne committed after Baptisme, is not the sinne against the holy Ghost.

The proofe from Gods word.

THough euery sinne in it selfe considered deserueth damnation: yet is there a sinne which shall be punished with many; and a sinne, which shall be punished with few stripes 1: a sinne vnto death and a sinn not vnto death2, a sinne against the Father, and the Sonne, which shallbe forgiuen; and a sinne against the holy Ghost, which neuer shallbe forgiuen 3.

So in their extant confessions witnesse the Churches in Bohem 4. Saxonie 5, and Heluetia 6.

Errors, & adversaries vnto this truth.

Diuerslly hath this doctrine bin oppugned. For

Some haue thought all sinnes to be like, and equall, as the Stoikes, Pelagians 7, and Iouinians 8.

Some haue taught, as Manes the heretike 9, how none of the godly fathers, and others from the beginning of the world, till the 15. yeare of Tiberius the Emperour (though earnestly they did repent, were saued; but were all punished alike with vtter confusion.

Some giue out that such persons be vtterly out of Gods fauour, and condemned, which depart out of this world, either afore they are baptized, as the Papists doe 10, or afore they come vnto yeares of discretion, as Hieranites did 11.

2. Proposition. The very regenerate may depart from grace giuen and fall into sinne, and yet rise againe vnto newnes of life.

The proofe from the word of God.

That the Regenerate may fall into sinne, and yet rise againe, it is a doctrine grounded vpon the Scriptures. For in them wee euidently may see, that fall they may, partly by the admonitions of our Sauiour vnto the man healed of the Palsie 12, and vnto the adultresse 13; of S. Paul, vnto the Ephesians 14, Colossians, 15, Hebrewes 16, and Timothie 17, and of S. Peter vnto all the godly 18, and partly by the examples of Dauid 19, Salomon 20, Peter 21, who egregiously, and very offensiuely did fall, and that they doe fall, it is most euident by the fift petitiō of the Lords praier were nothing els to prooue the same, but see afore 9. art. Prop. 3. art. 12. prop. 2. art. 15. propo. 2.

Next, that being fallen they may rise againe, and be saued, it is apparent both by the exhortations of the Angell vnto the Churches of Ephesus, Pergamus, and Thyatira 22, and by the examples of Peter, who denied 23, and yet afterward confessed his master Christ 24; and of all the disciples, who fled 25, and yet returned.

This both granted is, and published for truth by the Churches 26.

The adversaries vnto this truth.

Vnto this truth subscribe will not

Either by the Catharans 27, Nouatians 28, Iouinians 29, which thinke Gods people be regenerate into a pure, and Angelicall state, so that neither they be, nor can be defiled with any contagion of sinne.

Either the Libertines, whose opinions were that.

Whosoeuer hath Gods spirit in him, cannot sinne.

Dauid sinned not after he had receiued the holy Ghost 30.

Regeneration is the restoring of the estate wherein Adam was placed afore his fall 31.

Or the Papists who are of minde that

The workes of men iustified are perfect in this life 32. No man which is fallen into sinne, can rise againe, and be saued without their Sacrament of Penance 33.

S. Francis attained vnto the perfection of holines, and could not sinne at all 34.

3. Proposition. No men vtterly are to be cast off, as reprobates which vnfainedly repent

Such as doe fall from grace, and yet returne againe vnto the Lord by true repentance, are to be receiued as members of Gods church: and this by the Scripture is verefied. For there wee read, that

God would haue all men saued 35.

God is alwaies readie to receiue the penitent into fauour. For there is ioy in heauen for the sinner that conuerteth 36.

Christ is grieued when sinners will not repent 37.

He shall saue a soule from death, and hide a multitude of sinnes, which conuerteth a sinner from going astray out of his way 38.

The Lord would haue no man to perish, but al men to come to repentance 39.

If wee acknowledge our sinnes, he is faithfull and iust to forgiue vs our sinnes, and to clense vs from all vnrighteousnesse 40.

Hee exhorteth his erring people to repent, and doe their first workes 41: neither refuseth hee the sinner that repenteth, as appeareth in the example of the Prodigall sonne 42, and of the debter 43.

God then being so gratious, and mercifull, man after his ensample is both by all good meanes to prouoke sinners vnto repentance, and they testifying the same to receiue them into fauour.

So did S. Paul will the Galatians. Brethren (saith hee) if a man be fallen by occasion into any fault, yea which are spirituall, restore such one with the spirit of meekenes, considering thy selfe, least thou also be tempted 44.

So did hee enioyne the Corinthians, when hee saide

If anie hath caused sorrowe, the same hath not made me sorie, but partly (least I should more charge him) you all. It is sufficient vnto the same man, that he was rebuked of many. So that nowe contrarywise yee ought rather to forgiue, and comfort (him) least the same should be swallowed yp with ouermuch heauinesse 45.

When also he said, Receiue him (meaning Ouesinus 46.

And so teach the Churches 47.

Errors and Adversaries vnto this truth.

Adversaries vnto this truth are they

First, which leaue nothing but the vnappeasable wrath of God to such as doe sinne after Baptisme, as as did both in old time the Montanists 48, and Nouatians 49, and of late yeares Melchior Hoffman, the Arch Heretike of his daies 50, and the Anabaptists in Germaine 51, and the Barrowists among our selues in England 52.

Next, who say that being once regenerate, sinne is cut away, as with a Rasor, so that the godly cannot sinne, and therefore neede no repentance: so did the Messalians 53, and doe the Familie of Loue 54.

Lastly, the desperate, whose sinnes being either most infinite, or abominable, they thinke how God hee neither can, nor will forgiue them: such in times past were Kaine 55, and Iudas 56, in our fathers Franciscus Spira 57, and one Doctor Kraus 58, and in our daies, Bolton euen hee that first hatched that sect in England, which afterward was tearmed Brownisme 59.

Footnotes

  1. Luk. 12.40. ↩

    1. Ioh. 5.6.
    ↩
  2. Matth. 13.31. Mark. 3.39. Luke 22.10. ↩

  3. Confess. Bohe. c 4. ↩

  4. Confess. Sax. ar. 10. ↩

  5. Conf[?]ss. Helv. 2. c. 8. ↩

  6. Concil. Mil[?]vit. ↩

  7. D. Hieron. advers. In[?]i[?]. ↩

  8. Epiphan. ↩

  9. Sp[?]c. per[?]grin. quaest. d[?]c. 1. c. 3. q. 5. Position. Ingo stad. de Purgat. ↩

  10. Epiphan. ↩

  11. Ioh. 5.14. ↩

  12. Ioh. 8.11. ↩

  13. Eph 4.21, 22. ↩

  14. Coloss. 3 8. ↩

  15. Heb. 3.12. ↩

    1. Tim. 1.19. 2. Tim. 4.3. 2. Tim. 2.22.
    ↩
    1. Pet. 2.10. and 58. 2. Pet 3.17.
    ↩
    1. Sam. 11 4.
    ↩
    1. king. 11.3.
    ↩
  16. Math. 26.70.72.74. ↩

  17. Reuel. 2. ↩

  18. Luk. 22.55. ↩

  19. Act. 2.23. &c. & 3.13. & 4.10. &c. ↩

  20. Matth. 26 56. ↩

  21. Confess. Hel[?]. 2. c. 7. Bohem. c. 5.8. Saxon. ar. 10, 11. VVittem. ar. 32. S[?]e[?]ic[?], ar. 15. ↩

  22. Magd. eccles. hist. c[?]n. 12. c. 5. ↩

  23. Eus. l. 5. c. 43. ↩

  24. Magd. eccles. hist. cent. 4. c. 5. ↩

  25. VVilkinson against the F. of Loue, ar. 14. ↩

  26. Calv. contra Libert. fol. 217. ↩

  27. Tapp p. 189. ↩

  28. Concil. [?]rid. sess. 6. can. 29. ↩

  29. Vis ad apicē venire perfectionis? Vita cum moribus attende B. Francisci. ↩

  30. Matth. 11.28. i. Tim. 2.4. ↩

  31. Luke 15.7. ↩

  32. Luke 19.41, 42. &c. ↩

  33. Iam. 5.20. ↩

    1. Pet. 3.9.
    ↩
    1. Ioh. 1.9.
    ↩
  34. Reu. 2.5.16. ↩

  35. Luk. 15.20. ↩

  36. Matth. 18.26. &c. ↩

  37. Gal. 6.1. ↩

    1. Cor. 2.5, 6, 7.
    ↩
  38. Philem. v. 12. ↩

  39. Confess. Helv. 2. c. 14. Bohem. c. 5. August. ar. 11. Saxon. ar. 3. VVittem. ar. 12. ↩

  40. D. Hieron. adv. Marc. ↩

  41. Cypr. epist. 4. ad Antonian. ↩

  42. Bulling. contr. Anab. l. 2. c. 13. ↩

  43. Calv. Institut. ↩

  44. Giffords repl. ↩

  45. Magd. eccles. hist. cen. 4. c. 5. ↩

  46. H. N. spirit. land. c. 33. § 3. c. 34. § 11. c. 37. § 8. and Proverbs c. 5. § 15. and Crying voice § 6. ↩

  47. Gen. 4. ↩

  48. Act. 1. ↩

  49. Hist. Fr. Spir. ↩

  50. Luther on Gal. 3.[?]. ↩

  51. Giffords repl. to Barr. and Green. p. 17. ↩

Source: EEBO-TCP, https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A10958.0001.001