Jackson on Article XV: Of Christ alone without Sin
Bernard C. Jackson, 1900
Commentaries on Article XV: Rogers (1607)Ellis (1660)Burnet (1699)Beveridge (d. 1708)Welchman (1713)Practical Exposition (1716)Veneer (1725)Madan (1772)Hey (1796)Tomline (1799)Wilson (1821)Jones (1849)Trollope (1850)Browne (1850)Forbes (1867)Boultbee (1871)Maclear & Williams (1895)Green (1896)Gibson (1896)Jackson (1900)Bicknell (1919) · Article 15: text, context and Study
Article XV. Of Christ alone without Sin
Christ in the truth of our nature was made like unto us in all things, sin only except, from which he was clearly void, both in his flesh, and in his spirit. He came to be the Lamb without spot, who, by sacrifice of himself once made, should take away the sins of the world, and sin, as Saint John saith, was not in him. But all we the rest, although baptized, and born again in Christ, yet offend in many things; and if we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
Text: Book of Common Prayer (1662)
Cleaned OCR; [...] marks passages cut for illegibility. See the scan. Text: The Thirty-nine Articles: a short exposition, by Bernard C. Jackson (London: Church Book Room, 1900). Short notes on each Article. Cleaned OCR from the Internet Archive scan; passages too garbled to recover are marked [...]. Public domain.
This should be studied in close connection with the preceding Articles of this group. Article IX., with its profound statement of human sin, has led up to the statement of this Article on the sinless- ness of the Incarnate Christ. Article XI. on Justification finds its explanation in the statement of this Article on the one perfect sacrifice of the sinless Lamb of God; whilst the last clause of the Article re-affirms the doctrine of the abiding sinfulness of our human nature already stated at the end of Article IX.
_ The Article brings into close relation the reality and perfection of our Lord’s Incarnation, and the efficacy of His Atoning Sacrifice. This connec- tion is a vital point in Christian Doctrine. It was because ‘‘ Christ in the truth of our nature was made like unto us in all things, sin only except,’’ that “‘ by sacrifice of himself once made ’’ He could “ take away the sins of the world.’’ Because He stood clear of personal sin (Heb. iv., 15), he was free to suffer for the sins of others (John x., 18). Because He was ‘‘ the Son of Man”’ (Heb. ii., 14), His Sacrifice was accepted as a representative act (Mark x., 45 and 2 Cor. v., 14).
The last paragraph of the Article follows ‘closely the language of James iii., 2, and 1 John i., 8. It emphasises the universality of human sinfulness. This was denied by some Anabaptists. And, although the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception was not formally accepted by the
Roman Church until 1854, certain of the School- men taught that the Mother of our Lord was free from original sin. So that the Article is directed against this error, as well as that of the Anabaptists.
ARTICLE XVI. Or Sin AFTER Baptism.
Read at the Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/thirtyninearticl0000jack