Rogers on Article XXXII: Of the Marriage of Priests
Thomas Rogers, 1607
Commentaries on Article XXXII: Rogers (1607)Ellis (1660)Burnet (1699)Beveridge (d. 1708)Welchman (1713)Practical Exposition (1716)Veneer (1725)Madan (1772)Hey (1796)Tomline (1799)Wilson (1821)Jones (1849)Trollope (1850)Browne (1850)Forbes (1867)Boultbee (1871)Maclear & Williams (1895)Green (1896)Gibson (1896)Jackson (1900)Bicknell (1919) · Article 32: text, context and Study
Article XXXII. Of the Marriage of Priests
Bishops, Priests, and Deacons, are not commanded by God's Law, either to vow the estate of single life, or to abstain from marriage: therefore it is lawful for them, as for all other Christian men, to marry at their own discretion, as they shall judge the same to serve better to godliness.
Text: Book of Common Prayer (1662)
Transcription from EEBO-TCP (CC0): https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A10958.0001.001. Text: The Faith, Doctrine, and Religion, Professed, & Protected in the Realme of England (Cambridge: John Legatt, 1607), the edition later reprinted as The Catholic Doctrine of the Church of England. Transcription from EEBO-TCP A10958 (CC0), in its original spelling; special characters normalised; marginal references appear as notes; [?] marks an illegible letter and [...] an illegible passage in the source.
The Propositions.
-
By the word of God it is lawfull for Bishops, and all other ecclesiasticall Ministers, to marrie at their owne discretion.
-
It is lawfull by the word of God for all Christian men, and women to marrie at their owne discretion in the feare of God.
1. Proposition. By the word of God it is lawfull for Bishops, and all other ecclesiasticall ministers, to marrie, at their owne discretion.
The proofe from Gods word.
NEither the single, nor the wedded life is enioined any man, much lesse any calling of men by the word of God. And that ecclesiasticall ministers in particular may marry, it is euident both from the old, and the newe Testament.
From the old Testament, both by the Commandements giuen vnto the Priests for the choise of their wiues1, and by the examples also of the religious Priests, as Aaron2, Eli3, Zacharias 4, &c. & Prophets, which were all married, as it is thought except Ieremie.
From the newe Testament, by the words of S. Paul, who saith, A Bishop must be the husband of one wife; one that hath childrē vnder obediēce 5. An Elder must be vnreproueable: the husband of one wife; hauing faithfull children 6. Deacons must be the husbands of one wife; and haue wiues that be honest, not euill speakers &c. 7. and by the example of Peter 8, Paul, 9, yea of the Apostles 10, who were all married men, Iohn the Euangelist onely except, as some thinke.
All sincere Churches, and professors subscribe hereunto 11.
Adversaries vnto this truth.
And none of Gods churches, or people be of the mind.
Either of the vigilantians, that all, and euerie one of the Clerge, is necessarily to marrie, or not to be admitted for a Minister 12.
Or of the Iouinians, whose Elect, or Preists might not marrie 13.
Or of the Papists who teach, that.
From the Apostles time it was neuer lawfull for Priests to marrie 14.
The three orders of Deacons, Subdeacons, and Preists are bound not to marrie 15.
After Orders to marrie it is not lawfull 16; it is to turne back vnto Satan, and Apostacie 17.
None may be a priest, though hee will vowe a single life, if he haue bin a married man 18.
For a priest to play the whore-maister it is lesse offence then to take a wife. This was the speech of Cardinall Campeius 19 And most infamous is the Romish Clergie for their vnclean, and vncontinent. Hence written is it Of Pope Paul the 2. Anxia testiculos Pauli, ne Roma requiras, Filia huic nata est; haec docet esse m[?]rem Of Pope Innocent the 8: Bis quattuor Nocens genuit puellulos, Totidem sed et Nocens genuit puellulas. O’ Roma, possis hunc meritó dicere Patrem. Of Pope Alex. the 6: Non spado Alexander fuerat, Lucretia nempe Illius coniux nata nurus que fuit: Of the Priests: Multi vos sanctos, multi vos dicere Patres Gaudent, et vobis nomina tanta placent, Ast ego vos sanctos non possum dicere, Patres Possum, cùm natos vos genuisse sciam. Of the Iesuites: With women yee lie not, but with Males rather, Speake Iesuit, how canst thou be a Father? &c. 20.
2. Proposition. It is lawfull by the word of God for all Christian men, and women, to marrie at their owne discretion, in the feare of God.
The proofe from Gods word.
The Spirite of God saith vnto men, and women in all ages,
Bring foorth fruite, and multiplie, and fill the earth21.
Marriage is honorable among all men, and the bed vndefiled 22.
To auoide fornication, let euery man haue his wife; and euery woman haue her husband 23.
If they cannot abstaine, let them marrie 24.
Notwithstanding, in saying that Christians may marrie at their discretion, the meaning is not, that any may marry, if they thinke good, either within the degrees of kinred, and affinitie, prohibited by wholesome lawes; or without the consent of parents, or of others in the roome of parents if they be vnder tuition; or to other ends then God hath praefixed.
So testifie with vs the reformed Churches 25.
Errors & Adversaries to this truth.
Greatly hath this truth bin crossed, and contradicted. For
Some, leaue it not to men, and womens discretions, but compell them whether they will, or no to marrie: so did the Ossenes 26.
Some vtterly doe condemne marriage; as did the Gnostikes 27; the Hieracites 28; the Priscillianistes 29; the Montanistes 30; the Saturnians 31; the Aerians 32; the Apostolikes 33.
Some allowe of the wedded life: yet not in all sorts of persons. For
The Papistes forbid all Clergie men to marrie 34: as also all Godfathers, Godmothers, and whosoeuer be of spirituall kinred 35.
Some will haue none to marrie but Virgins, and single persons; as the Henricians 36.
Some condemne all alteration of marriage, or twice marrying, the husband or wife being dead; such haeretickes were the Catharans 37. &c.
Some would haue women, though married, to be all common, as the Nicolaitans 38, and Daui-georgians 39.
Some will nor marrie according to Gods ordinance, but thinke that one man, at one, and the same time, may haue manie wiues. In which were the Hermogenians 40; and are the Ohinites 41.
Footnotes
-
Leuit. 21.7. ↩
-
Leuit. 22.1. ↩
-
- Sam. 3.13.
-
Luke 1.5. ↩
-
- Tim. 3.
-
Tit. 1.5.6. ↩
-
- Tim. 2.11.12.
-
Matth. 8.14. ↩
-
Phil. 4.3. ↩
-
- Cor. 9.5.
-
Confes. Helue. 1. ar. 37. & 2. c. 29. Basil. ar. 10. §. 1.2. Bohem. c. 9.19. Gal. ar. 24. Aug. de abus. Saxon. ar. 18.21. Vittemb. c. 21.26. Sue. c. 12. ↩
-
D. Hiero. advers. Vigil. c. 1. ↩
-
D. Aug. epist. 74. ↩
-
Maioran. cly. milit. eccles. ↩
-
Test. Rhem. annot. m.p. 571. ↩
-
Ibid. an. 1. Tim. 3.2. ↩
-
Ibid. an. 1. Tim. 5.15. ↩
-
Ib[?]d. an. 1. Tim. 3.2. ↩
-
Sicida[?] com. 1. Tim. 5.9. l. 4. ↩
-
Iesuits catech. 2. B. cap. 15. p. 114. b. ↩
-
Gen. 1.27.28 ↩
-
Heb. 13.4. ↩
-
- Cor. 7.2.
-
Ibid. 9. ↩
-
Confess. Helue. 1. ar. 37. & 2. c. 29. Bohem. c. 19. Gal. ar. 24. August. de abus. ar. 4.5. Saxon. ar. 18. VVittemb. c. 21.26. Sue. c. 22. ↩
-
Heyde. discrip vrbis Hicrusal. l. 3. ↩
-
D. J[?]en. ↩
-
August. de haeres. ↩
-
Leg. epist. 93. c. 7. ↩
-
Euseb. ↩
-
Epiphan. ↩
-
Philastr. ↩
-
Epiphan. ↩
-
Test. Rhem. annot. 1. Tim. 5.9. ↩
-
See aboue ar. 25. pr. 8. ↩
-
Magde. ec. hist. Cen. 12. c. 5 ↩
-
D. August. de haeres. ↩
-
D. Iren. ↩
-
Hist. D. Georgii. ↩
-
Tertul. adu[?]. Hermog. ↩
-
Beza epist. 5.0.11. ↩
Source: EEBO-TCP, https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A10958.0001.001