anglicanguide.com v0.1

Rogers on Article II: Of the Word or Son of God, which was made very Man

Thomas Rogers, 1607

Commentaries on Article II: Rogers (1607)Ellis (1660)Burnet (1699)Beveridge (d. 1708)Welchman (1713)Practical Exposition (1716)Veneer (1725)Madan (1772)Hey (1796)Tomline (1799)Wilson (1821)Jones (1849)Trollope (1850)Browne (1850)Forbes (1867)Boultbee (1871)Maclear & Williams (1895)Green (1896)Gibson (1896)Jackson (1900)Bicknell (1919) · Article 2: text, context and Study

Article II. Of the Word or Son of God, which was made very Man

The Son, which is the Word of the Father, begotten from everlasting of the Father, the very and eternal God, and of one substance with the Father, took Man's nature in the womb of the blessed Virgin, of her substance: so that two whole and perfect Natures, that is to say, the Godhead and Manhood, were joined together in one Person, never to be divided, whereof is one Christ, very God, and very Man; who truly suffered, was crucified, dead, and buried, to reconcile his Father to us, and to be a sacrifice, not only for original guilt, but also for all actual sins of men.

Text: Book of Common Prayer (1662)

Transcription from EEBO-TCP (CC0): https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A10958.0001.001. Text: The Faith, Doctrine, and Religion, Professed, & Protected in the Realme of England (Cambridge: John Legatt, 1607), the edition later reprinted as The Catholic Doctrine of the Church of England. Transcription from EEBO-TCP A10958 (CC0), in its original spelling; special characters normalised; marginal references appear as notes; [?] marks an illegible letter and [...] an illegible passage in the source.

The propositions.

  1. Christ is very God.

  2. Christ is very man.

  3. Christ is God, and man, and that in one person.

  4. Christ is the Sauiour of mankinde.

1. Proposition. Christ is very God.

The proofe from Gods word.

IN the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and that Word was God 1. This is written of Christ. Therefore Christ is God.

Christ was begotten of the Father from euerlasting 2. Therefore verie God.

This is life eternall, that they knowe thee to be verie God, and whome thou hast sent, Iesus Christ3.

They shal call his name Emanuel, which is by interpretation, God with vs 4.

Christ he is the brightnes of the glorie, and the engraued image of (the Father) his person, and beareth vp all things by his mightie hand 5. Therefore verie God.

And this both hath bin of the auncient Christians 6, and is the Faith of the reformed Churches 7.

The Errors, and adversaries vnto this truth.

Miserably therefore doe they erre, which either denie, or impugne the deitie of our Sauiour, as did certaine old heretikes. viz.

The Arrians, whereof some were called the Douleians, because in scorne they tearmed the onely begotten of God, the Fathers seruant 8.

The Cerinthians 9.

The Ebionites, among whome some said that Christ Iesus was a meere man; others acknowledged him to be God, but not from euerlasting 10.

The Eunomians 11.

The Samosatenians, who thought that Christ was not the Sonne of God, before his incarnation 12.

The Nestorians, whose opinion was, that Christ became God by merit, but was not God by nature 13.

The Macedonians, which vtterly denied the Sonne to be of one substance with the Father 14.

The Agnoites, who held that the diuine nature of Christ was ignorant of some things 15.

Againe, some late heretikes euen to the death neuer would acknowledge Christ Iesus to be the true and verie God, as namely.

Certaine Catabaptists 16.

Blandrat 17.

Matthew Hamant (burnt at Norwitch an. 1579. one of whose heresies was that Christ was a meere, and sinnefull man 18.

Francis Ket (burnt also at Norwitch an. 1588.) who most obstinatelie maintained that Christ was not God til after his resurrection.

Dauid George, sometime of Basil, who affirmed himselfe to be greater for power then euer Christ was 19.

In oppugning the deitie of our Sauiour with these heretikes ioyne the Iewes 20, and Turkes, which say that Christ was a good man, such as Moses and Mahomet were 21, but not God. Hence Amurath. the great Turke in his letters vnto the Emp. Rodolph. the second, an 1593. tearmed our Sauiour in derision, The crucified God; vnto whome may be added the Familie of Loue 22.

2. Proposition. Christ is very man.

The proofe from Gods word.

HOlding the humanitie of Christ wee ioyne with the blessed Prophets, and Euangelists, who either prophecied of his future incarnation 23, and conception in the wombe of a virgine 24, or plainely auouched, and writ, both that the virgine Marie was his mother 25, and that, as verie man, he grewe, and increased in strength 26, endured hunger 27, and thirst 28, wept 29, and slept 30, and suffered death 31.

Hence the auncient Fathers, and Christians,

I beleeue in God, the Father almightie, &c. and in Iesus Christ, &c. which was conceiued by the holy Ghost, borne of the virgine Mary, suffered vnder Pontius Pilate, was crucified, dead and buried 32.

The right faith is, that we beleeue and confesse, that our Lord Iesus Christ, the Sonne of God, is God and man. God, of the substance of the Father, begotten before the world; and man, of the substance of his mother, borne in the world. Perfect God, and perfect man, of a reasonable soule, and humane flesh subsisting. Equal to the Father, as touching his Godhead; and inferiour to the Father, touching his manhood 33.

I beleeue in one God, the Father almightie, &c. and in one Lord Iesus Christ &c. who for vs men, and for our saluation came downe from heauen, and was incarnate by the holy Ghost of the virgine Marie, and was made man, &c 34.

The verie same testifie Gods people in Heluetia 35, Basil, 36, Bohemia 37, the Lowe countries 38, France 39, Ausburgh 40, Wittemberg 41, Suevia 42, with many moe besides 43.

The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth.

Therefore most wicked were the opinions of those men which held, viz. that,

  1. Christ really, and indeed had neither bodie, nor soule, but was man in appearance onely, as the Manichies 44, the Eutychians 45, the Marcionites 46, and the Saturnians 47.

  2. Christ had a bodie without a soule; as thought the Eunomians 48, the Arrians 49, the Apollinarians 50, with the Theopaschites 51.

  3. Christ tooke not flesh of the virgine Marie; so did the Valentinians thinke 52, and so thinke the Anabaptists 53, and the Familie of Loue, who make an allegorie of the Incarnation of Christ 54.

  4. Christ tooke flesh onely, of the virgine, but no soule; as the Arrians 55.

  5. Christ tooke flesh not of the virgine onely, but by the seede of man too; so said Ebion 56, and Carpocrates 57.

  6. The flesh of Christ was spirituall, and his soule carnal; so dreamed the Valentinians.

  7. The carnal bodie of Christ was consubstantial with the Father; as published the Apollinarians 58.

  8. The humane nature of Christ before his passion, was deuoide of humane affections; so thought the Seuerites 59 60.

3. Proposition. Christ is God, and man, and that in one person.

The proofe from Gods word.

THat the Diuine, and humane natures of Christ, are vnited in one person, it accordeth with the holy Scripture. For, The worde was made flesh, and dwelt among vs (and wee sawe the glorie thereof, as the glorie of the onely begotten of the Father) full of grace and truth, saith the Euangelist Iohn 61. And Matthew: Iesus when he was baptized &c. loe, a voice (came) from heauen, saying, This is my beloued Sonne in whome I am well pleased 62.

He that descended, is euen the same that ascended, farre aboue all heauens, that he might fill all things, saith S. Paul 63.

Againe, Christ Iesus, being in the forme of God, thought it no robberie to be equall with God, he made himselfe of no reputation, and tooke on him the forme of a seruant, and was made like vnto men, and was found in shape as a man, &c. wherefore God hath also highly exalted him, &c. that euery tongue should confesse that Iesus Christ is the Lord, vnto the glorie of God the Father 64.

And the same Apostle: There is one God, and one mediator betweene God and man, euen the man Christ Iesus; who gaue himselfe a ransome for all men 65.

Vpon these, and the like grounds.

I beleeue in God, the Father almightie, &c. and in Iesus Christ his onely Sonne our Lord, which was conceiued by the holy Ghost, borne of the virgine Mary 66.

The right faith is, that wee beleeue and confesse, that our Lord Iesus Christ, the Sonne of God, is God and man, &c. who although he be God and man; yet he is not two, but one Christ. One not by the conuersion of the Godhead into flesh; but by taking of the manhood vnto God. One altogether, not by confusion of substance, but by vnitie of person 67. I beleeue in one Lord Iesus Christ, the onely begotten sonne of God, begotten of the Father before all worldes, God of God, light of light, very God of very God; begotten not made; beeing of one substance with the Father, by whome all things were made: Who for vs men &c. came downe from heauen, and was incarnate, &c. He suffered, and was buried, &c. and he shall come againe &c 68. say the ancient and first Christians.

The very same is the beleefe, and confession of all the reforformed Churches at this present and alwaies hath bin 69.

Errors, and adversaries vnto this truth.

Detestable therefore is the error,

Of the Acephalians; who denied the properties of the two natures in Christ 70.

Of the Seuerites 71; of Eutiches and Dioscorus, who affirmed the diuinitie, and humanitie of Christ to be of one, and the same nature.

Of the Monothelites; who denied that two wils, viz. a diuine, and humane, were in Christ 72,

Of Theodorus Mesechius; who said that the word was one thing, and Christ another 73.

Of Nestorius; who denied the two natures of Christ to be otherwise vnited, than one freind is ioyned to another 74, which onely is in good will, and affection.

Of Seruetus; who said of Christ, that he was the patterne of all things, and but a figure of the Sonne of God; and that the body of Christ was compact of three vncreated elements 75, and so confounded, and ouerthrewe both natures.

4. Proposition. Christ is the Sauiour of mankinde.

The proofe from Gods word.

Christ to be the Sauiour of mankinde we finde it perspicuously in the holy Scripture, which teacheth vs that Christ was crucified, dead and buried 76; and that to reconcile his Father vnto vs 77; and to be a Sacrifice for all sinnes of men 78.

Hence, I beleeue the forgiuenes of sinne 79.

He suffered for our saluation 80.

For vs men, and for our saluation, he came downe from heauen 81 say our forefathers in their confessions: as doe also our brethren through-out Christendome 82.

Errors, and aduersaries vnto this truth.

Wicked then are all opinions, and assertions, contrarying, & crossing this truth: as;

That the Father, in his deitie, not the Sonne, in his humanity, did suffer, which error the Patripassians did hold 83.

That Christ, aswell in his diuinitie, as in his humanitie, suffered for mankind: an error of Apollinaris of old 84; and of Islebius, and Andreas Musculus, of late yeares 85.

That the whole and holy Trinitie was crucified; as said Petrus Antiochenus.

That Christ really, and indeed hung not on the crosse: for his passion was in showe onely, said the Cerdonites 86, the Euticheans 87, and the Manicheans 88: and another man, said the Theopaschits 89, and Basilides 90, yea the very Deuils, and not Christ, said the Manichies 91, suffered, and hung on the crosse.

That the whole passion of Christ is to be vnderstood allegorically, and not according to the letter; as the Familie of Loue doe thinke 92.

That Christ on the Crosse hath suffered 1 for the redemption of mankinde, and shall suffer againe for the saluation of the Deuills; such heretikes there haue bin 93; 2 as Iesus, but shal againe suffer as Iesus Christ (which was one of Francis Ket his heresies, for which he was burned); 3 for men, but one mother Iane is the Sauiour of women, a most execrable assertion of Postellus, the Iesuite 94.

The fantasies of the Iacobites 95, and Turkes 96.

The popish doctrine touching the Masse, praiers vnto Saintes, Pardons, and Purgatorie, which make the passion of Christ either of none effect, or to put away but originall sinne onely 97.

That albeit our Sauiour hath suffered for all men in generall: yet both each man must suffer for himselfe in particular 98; and the workes of one man may satisfie the iustice of God for another 99: which are popish errors.

That Christ died not for the sinns of all men; and that some sinnes are so filthie, and enormous, as Christ his blood vpon true repentance of the delinquents part, cannot wash them away: which was Kains 100, Fr. Spiras 101, and other desperate persons error.

That whatsoeuer is written touching Christ his sufferings, must in vs, and with vs be fulfilled; the false doctrine of H.N. 102

Footnotes

  1. Ioh. 1.1. ↩

  2. Psal. 2.7. Acts 13.33. Heb. 1.5. ↩

  3. Iohn 17.3. ↩

  4. Matth. 1.23. ↩

  5. Heb. 1.3. ↩

  6. I beleeue in God the Father &c, and in Iesus Christ his onely Son our Lord. Symb. Apost. The godhead of the Father, of the Sonne, and of the holy Ghost is all one: the glorie equall, the maiestie coeternall. Such as the Father is, such is the Sonne. The Father vncreate, the Sonne vncreate. The Father incomprehensible, the Sonne incomprehensible. The Father eternall, the Sonne eternall. The Father is almightie, the Sonne almightie; the Father is God, and the Sonne is God; the Father is Lord, and the Sonne is Lord. Symbol. Athanas. I beleeue in God the Father almightie &c. and in one Lord, Iesus Christ, the onely begotten Sonne of God, begotten of his Father before all worlds, God of God, light of light, very God of very God; begotten, not made; beeing of one substance with the Father. Symbol. Nicen. ↩

  7. Confess. Helvet. 1. ar. 11.2. cap. 11. Bohem. cap. 4.6. August. ar. 6. Gal. ar. 13, 14. Belg. ar. 10. VVittemb. cap. 2. Suevica ar. 2. ↩

  8. Theod. haeret. fab. lib. 4. ↩

  9. Irenaeus. ↩

  10. Euseb. eccles. hist. l. 3. c. 27. ↩

  11. Basil. l. 5. contra Eunom. ↩

  12. Concil. Bracar. cap. 2. ↩

  13. Liberatus. ↩

  14. Theodoret. l. 4. haeret. fab. ↩

  15. Gregor. epist. 22. l. 8. ↩

  16. Zuing. lib. contra Catabap. ↩

  17. Beza, epist. 19. ↩

  18. Holnis. chron. 12[?]99. ↩

  19. Hist. Dauidis Georg. ↩

  20. Lud. Caret. l. divinor. visor. ad Judaeos. ↩

  21. Policie of the Turkish Emp. c. 5. p. 16. ↩

  22. Display of the Fam. of Loue. H. 7. a. ↩

  23. The seed of the woman shall breake thine head. Gen. 3.15. The Scepter shall not depart &c. vntill Shiloh come. Gen. 49.10. ↩

  24. Behold, a virgine shall conceiue, and beare a sonne. Esa. 7.14. ↩

  25. Math. 10.18.23. Luk. 1.27.31.34. ↩

  26. Luk. 2.40. ↩

  27. When he had fasted 40 daies, and 40 nights, he was afterward hungrie. Mat. 4.2. ↩

  28. Ioh. 4.7. He said, I thirst. Ioh. 19.28. ↩

  29. Luk. 19.41. ↩

  30. Mark. 4.38. ↩

  31. Math. 27.50. Mark. 15.37. Luk. 23.46. Ioh. 19.30.33. ↩

  32. Symb. Apost. ↩

  33. Symb. Athan. ↩

  34. Sym. Nicen. ↩

  35. Confess. Helv. 1. ar. 11. & 2. c. 11. ↩

  36. Confes. Basi. ar. 4. ↩

  37. Confess. Bohem. c. 6. ↩

  38. Confess. Belg. ar. 18. ↩

  39. Confess. Gal. ar. 14. ↩

  40. Confess. August. ar. 3. ↩

  41. Confess. VVittemb. c. 2. ↩

  42. Confess. Suevica. ar. 2. ↩

  43. Harman. confess. praef. ↩

  44. August. l. 14. contra Faust. ↩

  45. Niceph. l. 18. c. 52. ↩

  46. Philast. Beza, epist. 81. ↩

  47. Iren. l. 1. c. 22. ↩

  48. Basil. contra Eunom. ↩

  49. Theodoret. haeret. fab. l. 4. ↩

  50. Ruffin. lib. 2. c. 20. ↩

  51. Niceph. l. 18. c. 53. ↩

  52. Iren. l. 1. c. 1. ↩

  53. Confess. Belg. ar. 18. ↩

  54. H.N. prophecie of the Spir. c. 19. sent. 9. ↩

  55. Epiphan. ↩

  56. Eusch. eccles. hist. l. 3. c. 27. ↩

  57. Iren. l. 1. c. 24 ↩

  58. Athan. lib. de incar. Christ. ↩

  59. Tertul. lib. de car. Christ. ↩

  60. Niceph. lib. 17. c. 29. ↩

  61. Ioh. 1.14. ↩

  62. Math. 3.17. ↩

  63. Eph. 4.10. ↩

  64. Phil. 2.6, 7, 9, 11. ↩

    1. Tim. 2.5, 6.
    ↩
  65. Symbol. Apost. ↩

  66. Symbol. Athan. ↩

  67. Symb. Nicen. ↩

  68. Confess. Helv. 1. c. 11. & 2. ar. 11. Basi. ar. 4. Bohem. ar. 6. Gal. ar. 15. Belg. ar. 19. August. ar. 3. VVittem. c. 2. Suevica, ar. 2. Harmon. confess. praef. ↩

  69. Hartman Schedel. ↩

  70. Niceph. l. 16. cap. 33. ↩

  71. Volater. l. 17. ↩

  72. Magdeburg. eccles hist. Cen. 6. c. 5. fol. 319. ↩

  73. Niceph. l. 18. c. 48. ↩

  74. Beza epist. 81. Confess. Gal. ar. 14. ↩

  75. Math. 27.26. &c. ↩

  76. We were reconciled to God by the death of his Son. Rom. 5.10. God hath reconciled vs vnto himselfe by Iesus Chr. 2. Cor. 5.18. by his crosse, Eph. 2.16. It pleased the Father &c. by him to reconcile all things vnto himselfe. Colos. 1 19, 20. ↩

  77. He hath borne our infirmities, and carried our sorrowes. Esa. 53.4. He is the lambe of God, which taketh away the sinne of the world. Ioh. 1.29. Christ hath redeemed vs from the curse of the Law, when he was made a curse for vs. G[?]l. 3.13. God h[?]th made him sinne for vs, which knew no sinne, that we should be the righteousnes of God in him 2. Cor. 5.2. He is the reconciliation for our sinne, and not for ours onely, but [?]lso for the whole world. 1. Ioh. 2.2. ↩

  78. Symb. Apostol. ↩

  79. Symb. Athanas. ↩

  80. Symb. Nicen. ↩

  81. Conf[?]ss. He[?]vel. 1. c. 11. & 2. ar. 11. Basil. ar. 4. Bohem. ar. 6. Gal. ar. 13.16.17. Belg. ar. 20.21. August. ar. 3. Saxun. ar. 3. VVittemb. c. 2. Suevica. Harmon. confess. praef. ↩

  82. D. August. de Trin. l. 5. ↩

  83. Magdeburg. eccles. hist. Ce[?]. 4. c. 5. ↩

  84. Beza, epist. 60. ↩

  85. Iren. l. 1. c. 23. ↩

  86. Nic. l. 18. c. 52. ↩

  87. August. contr. Faust. l. 15. c. 10. ↩

  88. Antoni[?]. tit. 13. c. 5. § 3. ↩

  89. Theod. Tert. ↩

  90. August. lib. de Fide, c. 32, 33. ↩

  91. H.N. Instr. ar. 4. sent. 17.29 ↩

  92. VVitnes Tho. Aquin. on 1. Pet. 3. ↩

  93. Iesuits Catec. 1. book. c. 10. ↩

  94. Niceph. l. 18. c. 52. ↩

  95. Lonic. Tur. hist. tom. 1. l. 1. ↩

  96. See art. 22.31. ↩

  97. Test. Rhem. in. Rom. 8.17. ↩

  98. Ibid. in. Col. 1.24. ↩

  99. Gen. 4. ↩

  100. Hist. Fr. Spir. ↩

  101. Prophet. of the Spir. cap. 19. sent. 3. ↩

Source: EEBO-TCP, https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A10958.0001.001